VTK8-Test-Failures

Revision as of 21:58, 4 April 2018 by MatthewLarsen (talk | contribs) (Queries)

Hybrid

Name Simple Rebaseline Notes
cinema-a.py Yes view/lighting
cinema-c.py (skipped)
cleanzonesonly.py No minor pixel diffs for plots, legend shifted slightly upwards. Should legends be removed from this test?
clonecopy.py (skipped)
clonefirstref.py Yes minor pixel diffs
conditional.py No some view/lighting, but also Interpolation:

conditional_04 conditional_05 conditional_06

conn_cmfe.py Yes view/lighting
coord_expr.py Yes view/lighting
curve_anim.py Yes view
curve_expressions.py No possible view clip issue with curve_exp_bin_02
cylindrical_radius.py Yes view/lighting
ddf.py No Interpolation ddf
defvar_anim.py Yes view/lighting
expr2engine.py Yes lighting
expr_cmfe.py Yes view/lighting
expressions.py Yes view/lighting
field_operators.py No Mostly view/lighting

Missing points

field_op_04

Inerpolation diffs

field_op_14 field_op_16 field_op_17 field_op_18

image_proc.py No Interpolation hybrid_image_proc
keyframe.py No view/lighting, but we should take a look at the strange highlighting of the endcaps on globe keyframe_43
lambda2.py Yes view/lighting
lineout.py (skipped)
locktime.py Yes minor pixel diffs
locus.py No could be just large quads split differently. look at locus_01
math_expr.py No quads split differently? see math_expr_02
matsel.py Yes view/lighting
matvf.py Yes view/lighting
merge_tree.py No Interpolation merge_tree
mesh_quality.py Yes view/lighting
mir.py Yes view/lighting
mir_cache.py Yes view/lighting
missingdata.py No Interpolation ? missingdata_0_01
movie.py (skipped)
multivar.py Yes view/lighting
pos_cmfe.py No Mostly view/lighting, except an Interpolation case pos_cmfe_01
py_exprs.py Yes minor pixel diffs
qcrit.py Yes view/lighting
replace.py No the surface is no longer smooth (curv3d.silo) see Replace3
selections.py (skipped)
selections_pp.py (skipped)
sil.py Yes view/lighting
simplify_mixed.py Yes view
specmf.py Yes minor pixel diffs
symm.py Yes view/lighting
time_cmfe.py Yes view/lighting
time_deriv_cmfe.py Yes view/lighting
time_iteration.py Yes view/lighting
timelock.py Yes view/lighting
val4mat.py Yes view

Plots

Name Simple Rebaseline Notes
surface.py Yes very small rendering changes, slight view change, line style not implemented

Session

Simulation

Databases

Faulttolerance

Queries

Name Simple Rebaseline Notes
hohlraum.py Yes lines are slightly off
length.py Yes lines are slightly off
avg_value.py Yes text and lines are slightly off
scf.py Yes text and lines are slightly off
conncomp.py Yes slight difference in the pixels
curvature.py Yes slight difference in the pixels

Rendering

Operators

Name Simple Rebaseline Notes
ic_pics.py (skipped)
ex_surf.py Yes diffs look like view change
transform.py No view clip issue with one curve plot ops_transform08
lcs_ic_2.py Yes diffs look like view change
lcs.py No pseudocolor interp / rendering diffs
displace.py No pseudocolor interp / rendering diffs, see ops_disp02
elevate.py Yes diffs look like lighting changes (new images look better)
clip.py No clip fast looks different (could be better, but we need to look at it) clip_globe_fast
threeslice.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
onionpeel.py No diffs look like view or lighting change

labels look better, but we should review bigsil_mesh_01

amr_stitch.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
ic_integration.py (skipped)
slice.py No most diffs look like view or lighting change, but may be some clipping changes

Some may be better:

ops_Slice02

Some may be worse:

ops_Slice37 ops_Slice39

tube.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
ic_pathlines.py (skipped)
multires.py no diffs
ic_geometry.py (skipped)
lcs_operator.py (skipped)
persistent_particles.py No most diffs look like view or lighting change

points are smaller, which is probably fine -- but we should review as a team persistent_particles_03

indexselect.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
resample.py No interp differences operators_resample
inverse_ghost_zone.py No most diffs look like view or lighting change

missing lines: ops_inverse_ghost_zone05

lcs_lc_1.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
sph_resample.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
isovolume.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
defer_expr.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
cart_proj.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
reflect.py No most diffs look like view or lighting change

lighting diffs, probably ok but we should review as a team ops_refl06 ops_refl07 ops_refl08 ops_refl09

vol rendering diff ops_refl14

radial_resample.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
cracksclipper.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
box.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
threshold.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
explode.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
dual_mesh.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
lic_streamlines.py (skipped)
ic_termination.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change
moveoperators.py Yes diffs look like view or lighting change

Meshtype

Name Simple Rebaseline Notes
arbpoly.py Yes view/lighting
csg.py Yes view/lighting
degen_mesh.py Yes view/lighting
emptydomains.py No Seems like view/lighting, but there appears to be highlighting along back edges of non-mesh plots:

emptydomains_02 emptydomains_03 emptydomains_04 emptydomains_07 emptydomains_10

globe.py No Mostly view/lighting, except Volume Rendering globe_04
point.py Yes view/lighting
rect3d.py No need another opinion, is this just view/lighting/opacity?

rect3d